🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising group of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our children's youth". A law is expected to be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and fit for minors," stated a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is largely happening at the state level due to national inaction.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various figures to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Views

Outside of the West, other nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more measured position. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this global discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that states around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.